And, so, as it’s been a while, let’s recap on what has been being done here and consider ‘where now’. Dissecting, questioning, dividing I’ve been dissecting thought and grammar into 2 basic intersecting dimensions of the analytic and the synthetic.… Continue reading
Let’s look now at the second level of, to give it its full name, the Arelian multi-dimensional paradynamic model of the self. At the first level, level 1, there are three components: mind, body and spirit. Within an Arelian model,… Continue reading
Or to give it its full name, the Arelian multi-dimensional paradynamic model of the self has a structure on 3 levels. On the ‘lower’ two levels, there are three component parts in each; on the first level, level 1, these… Continue reading
I talked in the previous post here about the ‘Paradynamic Self’, but I have since felt the need to take a step back and to talk first about Paradynamics. Yup, I rarely go a step forward without then going 2… Continue reading
My favourite dictionary defines care, in its more positive sense, as ‘heedfulness’. It implicitly defines heedfulness as ‘attentiveness’, ‘cautious-ness’. Similarly to use, care is both noun and verb but, of course, does not change its pronunciation between the noun and… Continue reading
I feel it’s a bit risky or, indeed perhaps, foolhardy to talk about abuse directly as it is such an emotionally loaded term and one might so easily end up saying something that others might see as glib, or as… Continue reading
Here, so far, there has been a lot of review of conventional theories, followed by questioning and deconstructing, and thinking about fundamentals and criteria. This is good and valid, I feel. However, it is only the foundation work for creating… Continue reading
I have said, previously here, that subject (often the doer of an action) and object (often the focus of an action) look to be viable and effective terms and to pass all the criteria, listed here so far, for safe… Continue reading
It seems to me that the term ‘adverbial’ needs to be removed from the synthetic-grammar lexicon, because it is not transparent and it is often unclear as to what is an adverbial and what is not. In the current conventional… Continue reading
Here, for ease of reference, is the set of criteria we are using in assessing the conventional wisdom, on the synthetic grammar of English, for its values and demerits. A successful classificatory system needs to have: absolute clarity as to… Continue reading